Voici ce qu'ils en pensent jusqu'à maintenant. ERN ON/SRN AND ERN QC/NB/NS... D1. MODELS CONTINUE TO DISPLAY A GOOD AGREEMENT ON THE PSTN OF TROF FROM LK ERIE TO STLWAR. THE MAIN AXIS OF PRECIPATION HAS BEEN DISPLACED TO THE SE INTO THE NEW ENGLAND STATES COMPARED TO PREVIOUS RUN WHICH WE AGREE WITH - AND FIRST 06HR OF INTEGRATION COMPARED TO OBS/RDRS SUPPORT IT. AS A RESULT THE QPF OVER AREAS OF ERN ON AND SRN QC IS APPROX 10 MM LOWER. D2. THE REG-LAM MOVES THE SECOND IMPLUSE FURTHER EAST TO TRAVEL NEWD ALONG THE AMERICAN SEABOARD. THE UKMET IS IN GOOD AGREEMENT WITH THIS TRACK. THE CEPS IS (((((SLIGHTLY SLOWER BUT SUPPORT REG FURTHER EAST SCENARIO. THE ECMWF HAS A TRACK EVEN FURTHER TO THE EAST. WHILE THESE SOLUTIONS ARE A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION, IT IS STILL POSSIBLE THAT THE LOW WILL TRACK FURTHER EAST THAN THE CURRENT REG MODEL RUN BUT WE ARE QUITE PLEASED WITH THIS NEW INTEGRATION. LAST FEW WEEKS HAVE SHOWN THAT EVERY MDL HAD ITS HITS/MISSES BUT PREFER SOLUTION)))) WHERE REG/UKMET/ECMWF CONVERGE. BOTH THE GLB AND THE NAM HAVE A MUCH DEEPER SLOWER UPR TROF BY T+48. THE NAM IS THE FASTEST AND DEEPER OF THE TWO DIGGING THIS TROF. BOTH ARE OUTLIERS COMPARED TO THE OTHER MODELS. FOR THE GLB THE RESULT IS AN SURFACE LOW 8 MB DEEPER. FOR THE NAM THE SURFACE LOW IS 3 MB DEEPER. THE TRACKS ARE MORE TO THE NORTH-WEST. AT T+48 BOTH LOWS ARE OVER SRN NH. THESE SOLUTIONS ARE REJECTED. CMC OBJ CHARTS SHOW HEAVY SNOW LCLY ABV 25CM OVER SRN QC - RGNS NR U.S. BRDR - AND OVR NRN NB WHICH SEEMS REASONABLE AS WELL AS HEAVY RAIN OVER SRN NB AND NS. CHARTS ALSO DEPICTED AN AREA OF FZG RAIN ACROSS SRN/CNTRL NB WHICH LOOKS SUSPICIOUS. LOW-LVL COOLING FCST BYD T+42 IS PROBABLY OVERDONE - DOES NOT SEEM REASAONBLE BTN TWO SIG RAIN EVENTS.